Why should you conduct a physician payment reconciliation?

Tomi Hagan (thagan@qhr.com) is Manager, Compliance and Holley Street (hstreet@qhr.com) is Associate Consultant at Compliance for Quorum Health Resources in Brentwood, TN.

Implementing routine physician payment reconciliation processes mitigates legal and regulatory risks and enhances the structure of compliance within your organization.

In 2017, the U.S. Department of Justice recovered $2.4 billion in healthcare fraud civil cases[1] and followed through on their 2015 pledge to hold individuals as well as corporations accountable. In recent years, several multi-million-dollar settlements related to Stark Law, Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS), and related False Claims Act enforcement, along with fines and penalties to executives and other individuals, resulted from improper referral relationships and activities.

Federal fraud and abuse laws prohibiting rewards for referrals are designed to protect patients by eliminating conflicts of interest that might lead a physician to prescribe a path of care that isn’t in the patient’s best interest. Financial relationships between hospitals and referral sources are subject to increasing government scrutiny, and violations can have significant financial and criminal consequences. Adopting practices for implementing and monitoring contracts with referral sources, identifying Stark Law and AKS compliance risks based on your current program structure, and performing an in-depth review of existing physician and referral source arrangements and payments will allow you to detect potential compliance risk exposure.

This document is only available to members. Please log in or become a member.
 


Would you like to read this entire article?

If you already subscribe to this publication, just log in. If not, let us send you an email with a link that will allow you to read the entire article for free. Just complete the following form.

* required field