RRC E-Alerts: March 2018

The following are summaries of news transmitted to RRC subscribers this month in email issues, the date of which is indicated in parentheses following each item. Weekly email and monthly print issues of RRC are archived on your subscriber-only website. Please call 888.580.8373 or email service@hcca-info.org if you require a password to access RRC’s subscriber-only website or are not receiving weekly email issues of the newsletter.

◆ Due to Congress’ recent legislation to raise spending caps imposed by sequestration, the White House on Feb. 12 released its fiscal year (FY) 2019 budget with an addendum, leading in some cases to two sets of numbers and many questions about the potential impact on agencies. NIH, for example, was facing a 27% reduction, but according to the addendum, the final amount proposed is equal to FY 2017 funding. Complicating the picture for NIH is that the $34.8 billion in the FY 2019 proposal is $2 billion less than what Congress approved for the current fiscal year. Similarly, the National Science Foundation, which was given a drop of 29% in the initial budget, is now recommended to be funded at 2017 levels.

All presidents’ budgets are simply proposals and are never enacted whole cloth by Congress, which determines actual appropriations. In this case, the new budget has little to no chance of adoption primarily because it proposes even deeper cuts than floated in the FY 2018 budget—which Congress rejected (RRC 5/17, p. 1). Nevertheless, the proposed budget sparked outrage from various organizations representing research universities and academic medical centers. (2/15/2018)

◆ A recently filed suit accuses the University of Pittsburgh (Pitt) of potentially covering up the escape of two animals allegedly infected with unidentified select agents and then firing the head of a lab when she complained, according to two press reports. Filed last month in Allegheny County Common Pleas Court, the suit alleges Kelly Stefano Cole’s contract was terminated in January 2017 after she expressed concerns a year earlier about how the escape of two animals from Regional Biocontainment Laboratory, of which she was associate director, was handled, the press reports say. Cole also was an associate professor in several departments, including of immunology and of microbiology and molecular genetics, based on a cached image of her staff listing at Pitt. The suit contends Cole was disciplined for small infractions, required to undergo retraining and ultimately was “fired.” A Pitt official was reported to have declined to comment on the pending litigation. (2/8/2018)

This document is only available to subscribers. Please log in or purchase access.


Would you like to read this entire article?

If you already subscribe to this publication, just log in. If not, let us send you an email with a link that will allow you to read the entire article for free. Just complete the following form.

* required field