Ordering and billing observation services: A simple service with complex regulations

Ronald Hirsch (rhirsch@r1rcm.com) is Vice President at R1 Physician Advisory Services in Chicago.

Ever since the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) created observation as a billable service that can be provided to Medicare beneficiaries, confusion has been the rule and not the exception. This begins with the decision about the proper use of observation. Prior to the Two-Midnight Rule, the decision of whether a patient warranted observation services or inpatient admission was a clinical decision made by the physician, based on the severity of the signs and symptoms of the patient and the medical predictability of an adverse event.[1] The Two-Midnight Rule, established in the 2014 Inpatient Prospective Payment Final Rule, made the decision a somewhat simpler one, based on the expected time the patient would require in the hospital, with observation indicated for patients who have an expectation of under two midnights and inpatient admission for those whose hospital care is expected to require more than two midnights. But four years later, most physicians still rely on utilization review staff to guide them to the right status.

This document is only available to members. Please log in or become a member.
 


Would you like to read this entire article?

If you already subscribe to this publication, just log in. If not, let us send you an email with a link that will allow you to read the entire article for free. Just complete the following form.

* required field